Download Books Online Kas yra istorija?
Edward Hallett Carr
Paperback | Pages: 162 pages Rating: 3.9 | 2716 Users | 176 Reviews
Itemize Containing Books Kas yra istorija?
| Title | : | Kas yra istorija? |
| Author | : | Edward Hallett Carr |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | First Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 162 pages |
| Published | : | 1999 by VAGA (first published 1961) |
| Categories | : | History. Nonfiction. Philosophy |
Description In Pursuance Of Books Kas yra istorija?
Parodyti taip, kaip buvo iš tiesų." Šitaip nusakęs tikrąjį istoriko tikslą Rankė pažadino deginančią objektyvumo aistrą vėlesnėms istorikų kartoms. Bet kas pasakys, kaip viskas buvo iš tikrųjų? Formuluodamas šiuolaikinį atsakymą į klausimą Kas yra istorija? profesorius Carras parodo, kad istorijos „faktai" yra tie, kuriuos pasirinko istorikai. Rubikoną peržengė milijonai žmoniję, bet istorikai teigia, kad tik Cezario persikėlimas buvo reikšmingas. Visi istorijos faktai yra interpretatyvinio istorikų pasirinkimo, nulemto jų epochos matų, rezultatas..Describe Books To Kas yra istorija?
| Original Title: | What is History? ISBN13 9785415014149 |
| Edition Language: | Lithuanian |
Rating Containing Books Kas yra istorija?
Ratings: 3.9 From 2716 Users | 176 ReviewsRate Containing Books Kas yra istorija?
Old news to the professionals, I suppose. I tell my students all the cliches already: "History is written by the victors"; "History is a cruel joke on the living"; "History is pop culture." (That last one is from Wuhl, by the way.) But Carr apparently got the ball rolling. To him, studying history means studying the historian. To him, facts are not objective, in that they were subjectively selected and arranged by a human being, subject to all the subjectivity bestowed upon him and her. And toExcerpt from my essay:Carr quickly discredits the notion of history as a universal entity, lambasting Actons proposal of an ultimate history by indicating that such a concept imposes a complete separation between subject and object. The 19th century positivist claim that history is a pure science is a false conviction based not on reality but rather, as Carr calls it, a cult of facts. Factuality comprises merely one aspect of the historians task. To have meaning, facts must be properly analyzed
If you have ever considered entering the historical profession or are having difficulty finding yourself within it, this is the essential book to read if you want to situate historical methods and practices in time.
This book contains 6 lectures E.H. Carr (1892-1982) gave, back in 1961 at the University of Cambridge. So, you surely can say it is a bit outdated. But nevertheless, I was very pleased about the value of Carr's opinions. These handle the methodology of the historic profession, as well as the philosophical foundations of it. Carr was a practicing diplomat, but he also published extensively on Russian and Soviet history. So he combined a profound interest in the theory of historical studies with
This is a masterful study of the questions historians ask themselves--and readers of history should ask themselves--about the nature of the writing of history. Is history a bunch of objective facts just put down by a disinterested bean-counter called an historian? Or is it a study of the past with the goal of shedding light on the present? Is it a 'tale of the victors', as the losers in history are usually obliterated? Is it cause and effect? Is there a Spirit of History, a World Spirit a la
Although he penned an immense collection of writings on the Soviet Union and international relations, most historians outside of his speciality know E. H. Carr as the author of What is History?, a historiographical work that challenged the traditional mindset of the field of history. Organized as a transcript of a series of lectures he gave on the subject, Carr attempts to answer the works eponymous question by examining trends, and several key scholars, over the fields development and rejecting
Truly a classic. "The abstract standard or value, divorced from society and divorced from history, is as much an illusion as the abstract individual" (p.84). And, as Lenin said, politics begins where the masses are - in the places where we are.
0 Comments